Windows 7 In-Depth Overview and Screenshots: More About Pow than Wow

This past weekend, we had the chance to attend a day-long press tour of Microsoft’s next operating system. After having some very candid conversations with high-level Windows PMs at two cocktail events and watching them give detailed presentations and demos for six hours on Sunday, we walked away with the indelible impression that the team in Redmond wants reliability and performance, not drool-worthy UI effects, to be the hallmarks of Windows 7. Yes, the pre-beta we saw was loaded with new features that users will truly appreciate. But at its core, Windows 7 is evolutionary, not revolutionary. And from where we sit, that’s a very good thing. Rather than re-inventing the wheel, Microsoft has wisely chosen to build upon the things it got right in Vista and tweak those it could have done better. Compatibility One of the biggest initial problems with Windows Vista was application and driver compatibility. While Microsoft may have been prepared to support Vista in January 2007, the larger world of vendors, OEMs, and software publishers—what Microsoft calls the “Windows ecosystem” was not prepared. Many devices had no Vista drivers at all or, worse still, buggy and unstable drivers for months after release. Similarly, plenty of applications didn’t work or wouldn’t work properly with Vista. With its upcoming OS, Microsoft is making a bold promise: If a device or program works in Vista, it will work at least as well in Windows 7, even if a manufacturer or developer doesn’t update. Even stubborn apps that refuse to run because they are programmed to detect the OS and launch only in Vista will be able to run. We even saw a demonstration of how the Windows 7 operating system learns from application crashes and attempts to correct them the second or third time you launch. “I don’t think it’s necessary to break everything to make a big change,” said Steven Sinofsky, SVP of Windows and Windows Live, during his presentation on the shift in Microsoft’s approach to developing its core product. In addition to providing all kinds of compatibility functions and keeping the driver model the same as Vista, Microsoft is working aggressively with its partners in the rest of the “ecosystem” to keep them up to speed on new Windows 7 specs as the development cycle progresses. The belief is that, this time around, hardware vendors and software publishers will have more than enough time and advance notice to take full advantage of the new OS’ features on day one. And even if they don’t lift a finger, their products should work. Performance After watching all the presentations on Sunday, and reading the Windows 7 Blog, it’s clear that Microsoft wants to make Windows boot significantly faster than Vista or even XP. During a presentation on performance, Gabriel Aul, group program manager of Windows Fundamentals, listed several steps Redmond is taking to speed start times:

  • Increasing parallel device initialization so several different parts of your computer turn on at the same time during boot.
  • Loading fewer bytes per boot so the hard drive and system bus have less data they need to work with.
  • Changing the way Windows components are initialized to make them start faster.

During his presentation, Aul showed a boot drag race, where a Windows Vista machine and a Windows 7 machine booted side by side—the Windows 7 machine won by several seconds. The sample system Microsoft loaned us, a Lenovo ThinkPad X300 with Windows 7 pre-beta installed, boots very quickly, but to see the boot time difference, we’re looking forward to trying both Vista and Windows 7 on a few different systems to see how things compare. Aul also showed an intriguing memory test. On two different systems, he ran a script that opens dozens of different application windows in the span of a few seconds. On the Vista system, opening dozens of windows ate up a bulk of the memory, eventually forcing the system to turn off high-performance features like Aero glass, just to keep up. On the Windows 7 system, each window uses much less memory so those of us who end up with ten IE windows, five Outlook e-mails, three Photoshop graphics, and four IM chats open at the same time will not see a big slowdown. Battery Life Windows 7 is also supposed to increase notebook battery life in several ways, including:

  • Reducing background activities so the system processor can stay in an idle, power-saving state for longer.
  • Adaptive brightness, which dims the screen and brightens the screen a bit more intelligently.
  • Efficient DVD playback that uses fewer system resources.
  • A smart network power feature that turns off your Ethernet port when there’s no cable plugged in.
  • Power Config, a new utility that detects energy-sucking problems and recommends changes.

Will Windows 7 really make a big difference in battery life? In the near future, we plan to run our battery tests on several different systems, under both Vista and Windows 7 so we can find out.

Next: UI Improvements >>

AUTHOR BIO
Avram Piltch
Avram Piltch
The official Geeks Geek, as his weekly column is titled, Avram Piltch has guided the editorial and production of Laptopmag.com since 2007. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram programmed several of LAPTOP's real-world benchmarks, including the LAPTOP Battery Test. He holds a master’s degree in English from NYU.
Avram Piltch on
Facebook Twitter Google+
LEAVE A REPLY
Name*
Email* (will not be published)
Website
*Indicates required field
Comments*
Submit Comments

  1. bogie Says:

    The big question for me is what are they doing to enable EAX/Dolby Surround in gaming? Are X-Fi cards going to work properly in Windows 7 with respect to surround sound?

    Vista is horribly broken in this respect.

  2. Cool Says:

    This is gonna be the best version of Windows ever!! Mac OS X killer

  3. Cool Says:

    Goodbye Mac and Linux

  4. same s**t Says:

    Can ANY one tell what s reaaally different between this and previous ms os ???

  5. Anonymous Says:

    You Windows fanboys need to shut the hell up about the next version of your crappy distribution until it actually comes out. NO! This is going to be little different than Vista. All I saw in all the reviews of this dull release of Windows was that just about all the new features were pretty much stolen from Linux.

    The GUI itself is a blatant and obvious copy of KDE 4! But you MS fanboys will probably dismiss me as a troll, and think Microsoft actually innovated, which is one thing Microsoft NEVER did in its 30 years of existence.

    Windows 7 is crap. Get over it. Windows has dropped under 90% last year. Linux is starting to beat it on the desktop.

  6. sergey Says:

    I, for one, would also like to know how it performs against XP, which is still an OS of pretty obvious choice for netbooks.

  7. Intosh Says:

    Linux has been “starting to beat” Windows since 2005. When will it actually “beat” Windows?! LOL.

  8. OhMyGod Says:

    I don’t like the new superbar and the system is still too slow on my notebook… slower than vista indeed :/

  9. lou Says:

    So after being wined and dined by Microsoft you came away impressed?
    LOL.

  10. victor Umba Says:

    My love for windows is not divorcable. alittle correction to will do the magic

  11. asktemi Says:

    There are so many car makers in the world, you either go for a GM or a Toyota. As you like it. if anyone likes apple’s system let him go for it, and if it is Microsoft why not go for it.

  12. windows dead Says:

    you cannot compare mac os and bullshit windows, Mac is strongly have much better design in kernel all sides as well, so , :) install mac os and then repeat bullshit MS… nothing to do in graphic or security or easiy usage or stability against mac, down with Ms!

  13. Free soft Says:

    Windows is just an expensive OS we have to buy because we have no choice.

    I like to work with windows, but i dont see those great diferences form xp to 7.

    I never worked with Linux, but i expect it to become more and more popular.

    Democratize Operative Systems!!! The Microsoft software is so expensive!!! Thats why MS have enourmous profits… and almost no one benefits from it.

FIND A REVIEW
Laptops
All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Brand
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
Resolution
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options
SUBSCRIBE