In-Depth with the OCZ Core Series Low-Cost SSD
July 25th, 2008 by Avram Piltch
Last week, we got our hands on a 64GB OCZ Core Series SSD and posted our initial findings, which were pretty encouraging. After an additional week and dozens of tests performed on the Core Series and three other drives for comparison’s sake, we still have warm feelings for the Core Series, because it opens single applications lighting fast, but we also have some qualms with its performance under heavy stress, particularly when zipping a file.
Other Drives Tested
Before we give the OCZ Core Series a star rating, we’ll want to compare it to more SSDs with MLC memory. We won’t get into it here, but for those who don’t know much about the NAND memory used in SSDs, there are two kinds: the more-expensive SLC (single-level cell) and the less-expensive MLC (multi-level cell) memory. To keep prices low, OCZ uses MLC memory in the Core Series.
For this round of tests, we were able to compare the OCZ Core Series to one other MLC-based SSD, a 60GB Super Talent MasterDrive MX, along with a much more-expensive SLC disk, a Samsung SATA II 64GB, and a garden-variety 250GB 5,400rpm hard drive, the Western Digital Scorpio Blue. While the MasterDrive sits in the same price price range ($250 - $300) as the Core Series, the Samsung gave us an opportunity to see how the new drive stacks up against units that are triple the price, and the Western Digital is just a typical hard drive that any notebook might have pre-installed.
Tags: SuperTalent MasterDrive MX, Samsung SATA II SSD, OCZ Core Series, SSDs | 4 Comments »

We all know that It’s only a matter of time before the last mechanical hard drive whirs its way into a landfill mound, right next to a Tandy cassette drive and a giant pile of Zip disks. But we’re all waiting impatiently, because SSDs still cost too much and store too little.