Smartphone Camera Shootout 2013

Round 2: Outdoor Daytime Close-Up Shot

We took some close up shots of flowers in Madison Square Park to see which phone captured the most color and detail. All images were taken at the exact same time in the same location in daylight.


1. Nokia Lumia 920: The Lumia completely dominated the competition in this round. The color in the flower petals is bold, bright and more accurate in this image than any of the others. The detail is sharp and defined–without even zooming in you can see the texture of the flower petals. This image makes you want to go outside and pick one of those flowers.


2. BlackBerry Z10: This image is about on par with the iPhone’s, but you can notice a lot more detail in the stem area. When blowing up the image to 100 percent, the fuzz on the stem is sharper and more clear than the iPhone’s.

MORE: 10 Best Android Smartphones


3. Apple iPhone 5: Although the lighting isn’t perfect, the iPhone 5 nearly nails it in this image. The colors in the stem and leaves could use more pop, but the contrast and detail is better in this photo than most other phones.


4. LG Optimus G Pro: LG’s camera did a really good job capturing detail in this image. The green color in the stems and leaves is generally accurate, although there’s a slight blueish tone.


5. Sony Xperia ZL: There’s too much color saturation in this image, and the green color found in the leaves and stems is kind of dull. That being said, the contrast is significantly better and more accurate in this photo than in the HTC One’s and the Nexus 4’s.


6. Google Nexus 4: The Nexus 4’s image has the same problem as the HTC One’s, but not as severe. The yellow areas of the flower show too much white and the purple shades are too dark.

MORE: 25 Best Android Apps


7. HTC One: The lighter sections of the image, such as the yellow area of the petals where the light is hitting the flower, look way too bright and blown out. There’s a contrast issue here that makes the purple center of the petal look too dark and unnatural against the yellow outline.


8. Samsung Galaxy S4: Samsung’s flagship had some trouble rendering color in this image. The yellow shade in the flowers’ petals isn’t very accurate, and the color as a whole doesn’t look as bright as it should. When blowing up the photo to 100 percent and examining the details, we noticed that the edges of the petals look much sharper than they should–almost to the point that it’s unnatural.


9. Motorola Droid RAZR HD: There’s not much wrong with the detail in this image, but the color is significantly skewed. When looking closely at the stems in the photo, you can tell that they have a brownish tone rather than the rich green that they should have.

Smartphone Camera Shootout

Lisa Eadicicco
Lisa Eadicicco
Lisa has been reporting on all things mobile for since early 2013. When she’s not reviewing gadgets, she’s usually browsing patent databases or interviewing experts to track down the hottest tech trends before they even happen. Lisa holds a B.A. in Journalism from SUNY Purchase and has contributed to The International Business Times, The New York Daily News and Guitar World Magazine.
Lisa Eadicicco on
Twitter Google+
Email* (will not be published)
*Indicates required field
Submit Comments

  1. jb82 Says:

    You give 1st place to a camera that produced grainy or hazy or inaccurate color photos most of the time! 2nd place to one that is out of focus half the time.

    You need to work on your focus across the range – half the shots are out of focus and I imagine that is down to the taker not the camera. For instance the HTC one is known for good macro shots. Yours didn’t even focus on the main flower in the center!

  2. Joseph Chen Says:

    Ummm……which smartphone placed 2nd in the “Night Portrait with Flash” category?

  3. Yanbo Says:


    Just curious to know, why you’ve left Nokia PureView 808 out of competition?


  4. Mark Spoonauer, LAPTOP Editor in Chief Says:

    Hi Yanbo,

    Thanks for your question. We wanted to include a Lumia device since that’s more readily available in the U.S. It’s a device consumers are more likely to purchase.


  5. Todd McGrew Says:

    What’s so obvious is that everything yall publish comparing smartphones yall favor iPhone. Sorry to rain in on your parade buddybut iI’m a professional photographer and have personally compared iPhone 5, iPhone 4s, Samsung Galaxy SIII, and Samsung Galaxy S4. It wasn’t even close. Both Galaxy’s outperformed even the iPhone 5. All my shots/tests were concluded under well controlled conditions. ie: professional climate. Also it may be worth mentioning that I was biased prior to these examinations in that I’m an American and I was pulling for the domestic products. However, to my complete dismay the Samsung(s) were far superior in almost every control group. After reading your article I can say without any reasonable doubt that you, my friend, are extensively more biased than even I. Which leads me to believe that you/your magazine may just have some monetary incentives for publishing such blatant misinformation.

  6. Cornell Tramontana Says:

    1. Did you use the same metering-mode for each picture in a given round? The range of exposures in “Round 8: Night Portrait without Flash” me wonder whether the same metering-mode was used for all smart-phone cameras in that round.
    2. As far as color accuracy in Round 8, the color rendition would be influenced by the artificial lighting;as such, color accuracy not be expected to be correct.

  7. bobAbooey Says:

    For goodness sake, they’re phones, not actual cameras, all of them took good pictures in one form or another.
    NONE of them took Great pictures in every (or even any) category.

  8. Shani Says:

    Just interested to know if anyone can tell me which smartphone is best to take pics of moving objects (my daughter)? And also which ones have a fast response time? Drives me crazy having to wait for it to focus before taking a shot. Thanks :)

  9. Azure Says:

    Sorry but my iPHone 5 is well capable to shoot much better pics than those seen here….Especially with 3rd party apps where you can control WB, Light, Exposure and the final Jpeg process…..


  10. Carl T Says:

    You may want to double-check the scorecard. If you look in the last column, you’ll see there are two phones with rank 8 and none with rank 2. The opposite is true in the second to last column.

  11. Some Guy Says:

    Well I have to say Azure is clearly a biased Apple zealot. Why focus on the iPhone 5 as any phone could take great pictures when using 3rd party apps to clean things up. It’s sad that iPhone lovers are such bigots, they act like nothing else can possibly compare to Apple. Too funny…

  12. David Spahr Says:

    When it comes to evaluating phone cameras, you don’t know what you are doing. Did I find out what I wanted to know? Absolutely not. The reviewers are as bad as the cameras. Close up? Exposure compensation? Flash adjustment? Slow synch? Your comments about contrast and sharpness are absurd. Edges too sharp? You prefer chromatic abberation? Too much contrast? Seriously? Fogginess, haziness is acceptable? Whaaat????

  13. David Spahr Says:

    The really absurd thing about this review is that you comment that the iPhone has lower sharpness (and obviously lower contrast) in the outdoor scenic shot and put it at number 2 as if to suggest it is even remotely in the same league as the Galaxy 4 right above it. All of my landscapes would look like that? I would take a few pictures like that and immediately shop for another camera. Any camera that makes that kind of a “scenic” is last in my book. Anyone comparing image no. 1 with no. 2 will immediately spot your bias.

  14. Deirdre Says:

    Please get rid of those ANNOYING ads!

  15. saalik Says:

    AAAAnd the iPhone is not made in america…………

  16. Michael Says:

    One phone (which isn’t exactly mainsteam i get that) which could outperform any of these is the Lumia 1020 with a 41mp camera, I have a Huawei ascend mate (which is more of a tablet) and im not exactly pro Nokia, i find the phones too colourful and look more like toys.. But this test was to see which smartphone has the better camera, not which smartphone that allot of people own has the best camera.. This test in that sense was pretty useless.. Sorry, but it’s my opinion

  17. Vikki Virad Says:

    HA HA hA Apple fan girl exaggerated the whole scenario

  18. seth Says:

    wow, what a bunch of complainers… this review was helpful and I exactly what I was looking for. thank you

  19. Sondra Says:

    Have to say I use my iPhone 5 for taking lots of photos. Rarely do they have to be adjusted! I take sports photos of my kids and everything. I use Pro Camera which is amazing and takes great pictures. So yes you can take great pictures with the iPhone5.

All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options