Samsung Wants $1 Billion Verdict Scrapped, Alleges Jury Foreman Misconduct

Did the jury foreman in the $1 billion Apple vs. Samsung court case withhold information that would have brought his neutrality into question? That’s exactly what Samsung claims in a new request to dismiss the case based on Velvin Hogan’s alleged misconduct.

Samsung claims that Hogan failed to disclose a 1993 bankruptcy as well as the fact that Seagate, Hogan’s former employer, took him to court as part of the fallout. Samsung maintains a close working relationship with Seagate.

“Mr. Hogan’s failure to disclose the Seagate suit raises issues of bias that Samsung should have been allowed to explore,” the Korean company claimed in its filing.

For his part, Hogan tells Bloomberg that the jury selection questions asked specifically about litigation that occurred in the previous decade, while his bankruptcy and Seagate issues occurred nearly 20 years ago. Hogan claims he wasn’t trying to hide information, only answering the questions truthfully as they were posed.

The jury foreman finds it hard to believe that Samsung didn’t know his history, and mused aloud whether Samsung “let me in the jury just to have an excuse for a new trial if it didn’t go in their favor.”

Hogan spent nearly 40 years working as an electrical engineer, with 35 of those spent at hard drive companies. Post-trial, he’s been very open to discussing the case and explaining the jury’s decision-making process.

The allegations are part of a larger legislative blitz Samsung recently launched against Apple. Yesterday, the company filed a motion to add the iPhone 5 to an upcoming patent trial and convinced Judge Lucy Koh to lift the preliminary injunction against the Galaxy Tab 10.1.

LEAVE A REPLY
Name*
Email* (will not be published)
Website
*Indicates required field
Comments*
Submit Comments

  1. Pete Austin Says:

    If you read the transcript you’ll see that the court asked all potential
    jurors to disclose any lawsuits that they had been involved with. No mention of
    a 10 year limit, which the jury foreman says was the reason why he didn’t speak up
    about how he was sued by a company which has Samsung as the largest shareholder.
    Indeed another juror revealed information about a case that was older – search for “1998”.
    Here’s the transcript: http://www.groklaw.net/pdf4/ApplevSamsung-1991Ex1.pdf

FIND A REVIEW
Laptops
All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Brand
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
Resolution
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options
SUBSCRIBE