Pay Raises Won’t End Chinese Factory Abuses

 Chinese Factory Raises

The biggest story in tech for the past few weeks has not been about a phone or tablet, but a set of poorly treated workers in China. When the New York Times published an expose about dangerous and abusive working conditions at Foxconn’s Apple production facilities, the paper started a wave of news coverage about labor abuses and inspired a number of activist groups to demand a “ethical iPhone.” Sensing the damage to its reputation and potential impact on sales, Apple has responded by inviting third party inspectors from the Fair Labor Association into its suppliers’ plants and Foxconn has announced that it’s giving workers a 16 to 25 percent raise.

Unfortunately, neither raises nor inspections that double as photo ops will fix the system-wide problems that should bother us. By focusing their attention on Apple alone, both activists and press are minimizing the scope of abuses that are much worse at non-Foxconn facilities.

If you were a fly on the wall at a Chinese electronic factory and could see everything without being detected, would it be the low pay checks given to the workers that really pulled at your heart strings? Or would it be:

  • Abusive Supervisors: At many factories, workers are berated and verbally abused by their bosses in ways that wouldn’t even fly at a prison labor facility in the U.S. According to an investigation conducted by China Labor Watch (CLW),  At Catcher Electronics, a supplier that makes phones and notebooks for Dell, Apple, Nokia, ASUS, Acer, Sony, Motorola and IBM, the supervisors often berate workers and even worse “the department head will sometimes use corporal punishment, physically hitting workers.”

    At other facilities, workers aren’t physically struck, but are punished like bad children and humiliated publicly. For example, at Foxconn’s Longhua plant, CLW found that:

    Some discipline practices that workers who make mistakes are subject to are abusive and insulting. This includes: workers are required to write a report of at least 500 words and post the report with their photo on the wall; workers are required to stand still for thirty minutes to four hours, etc. 

    It’s hard to imagine that even providing a 25 percent raise will do anything to stop this kind of abusive treatment. I can’t imagine a supervisor saying “we can’t make this worker write a humiliating self-assessment test; he’s earning a full 1,800 yuan ($290) per month. 

  • Poor Safety Conditions: When Fair Labor Association President Aurent van Heerden said Foxconn’s plants were “way, way above the avrage of the norm,” he may have been correct as China Labor Watch found fewer safety issues at the Foxconn plants they investigated last spring than those run by other suppliers. According to CLW, at Catcher Electronics, workers who are exposed to noxious gases wear masks that aren’t good enough to stop them from smelling the nauseating fumes. At a Compal plant, workers reported that there are no first aid kits and, when injuries occur, the supervisor just hands out cotton.  
  • Extremely Long Hours: Despite an accepted limit of 60 hours per week per employee, many companies require their employees to work a lot more than that, with no ability to turn down overtime. For example, at the Hongkai Electronic Technology plant in Dongguan, workers reported being required to labor 11 to 12 hours a day for 30 days a month from September to November. And this is physically and mentally taxing work too.

  • No Talking, Bathroom Breaks: At many factories, CLW reports, workers get very few breaks, perhaps even just one 10-minute break all day. A lot of supervisors will not allow workers to get out of the line to go to the bathroom so workers try not to drink anything. According to CLW, workers at the MSI factory are even forbidden from talking during their shifts.
  • Repetitive, Machine-Like Work: CLW reports that workers in an HP production line were forced to complete an action every 3 seconds while standing for 10 hours straight. Imagine standing there, having to turn your brain off, and just act like an automaton all day long.
  • Unpaid Labor: Whether they’re forced to pay recruitment fees that equal weeks or even months of salary, fined several days’ worth of salary for minor mistakes, or not paid for any outstanding days when they resign, suppliers’ find lots of ways to avoid paying their employees. So, even if they receive a raise, there’s no guarantee workers won’t lose some or all of that money due to abuses.
  • Sub-human Living Conditions: At most factories, at least some of the workers live on campus. The dorms sometimes pack over a dozen people into the same room, with unsanitary conditions surrounding them. At Flextronics, CLW reports that:

    The sanitary conditions of the factory cafeteria are very poor. Interviewed workers all said that there are frequently worms, flies, or other foreign objects in the soup or food. 

Though leading labor watchdogs like China Labor Watch’s Li Qiang and SumOfUs’s Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman say that having Apple pay higher rates to suppliers should help these problems, it’s clear that it will take more than just dollars to stop abuses that come from a fundamental disrespect of the workers as human beings. Who can say how much dignity would cost?

Inspections can help, if they’re done by an objective third party. There were questions about the Fair Labor Association’s objectivity before it set foot in a single Foxconn factory, and it all but proved that it’s not acting in good faith when its president released a set of conclusions after just two days of investigation had passed.

However, even if the FLA or other inspection groups really tried their best to ferret out abuses, they’d have a hard time getting to the truth. The CLW report states that most of the factories cleaned up their acts when inspectors were around, making it look like they were safer than they were. Worker reports can help, but advocates I talked to feel that those reports should be collected via hotline, not right there in the factory where workers may not feel as comfortable in registering complaints, even with the promise of anonymity.

Workers in developing countries are not going to earn the same minimum wage or attain the same standard are living that most gadget users enjoy. But no matter their salaries, all workers deserve to be treated like human beings rather than disposable parts.

A voluntary humane labor certification system in the style of EPEAT’s environmental ratings could help, but what’s needed most is an unyielding commitment to human dignity at every link in the supply chain, from suppliers to consumers. As end users, we need to demand a verifiable culture of respect wherever our devices are made. It’s not about some workers we’ll never meet who live half a world away; it’s about what kind of people we want to be.

AUTHOR BIO
Avram Piltch
Avram Piltch
The official Geeks Geek, as his weekly column is titled, Avram Piltch has guided the editorial and production of Laptopmag.com since 2007. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram programmed several of LAPTOP's real-world benchmarks, including the LAPTOP Battery Test. He holds a master’s degree in English from NYU.
Avram Piltch on
Twitter Google+
LEAVE A REPLY
Name*
Email* (will not be published)
Website
*Indicates required field
Comments*
Submit Comments

  1. Richard T Stern Says:

    Better yet, why not bring thhese jobs back into the states, giving employees a better life and creating more jobs. Possibly tax incentives.

FIND A REVIEW
Laptops
All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Brand
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating Editor's Choice 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
Resolution
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options
SUBSCRIBE