<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus FE-370: Keep It or Toss It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/olympus-fe-370-keep-it-or-toss-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/olympus-fe-370-keep-it-or-toss-it</link>
	<description>News and views on today&#039;s hottest laptops, cell phones, and other mobile devices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/olympus-fe-370-keep-it-or-toss-it/comment-page-1#comment-19895</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=8497#comment-19895</guid>
		<description>I did a very massive home work and gone for FE-370. Ofcourse I haven&#039;t tested till time as I don&#039;t have time to do it. But to my suprise, it&#039;s technology is superb. So far in my short testing, it is observed that it is best suited for outdoor rather than indoor as it produces poor quality pictures in low light. 

I was using Olympus CMEDIA C-370, an excellent camera in it&#039;s class. The only disadvantage is the battery cover. The latches goes-off frequently in operation. Unfortunately, Olympus charges very high for spares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a very massive home work and gone for FE-370. Ofcourse I haven&#8217;t tested till time as I don&#8217;t have time to do it. But to my suprise, it&#8217;s technology is superb. So far in my short testing, it is observed that it is best suited for outdoor rather than indoor as it produces poor quality pictures in low light. </p>
<p>I was using Olympus CMEDIA C-370, an excellent camera in it&#8217;s class. The only disadvantage is the battery cover. The latches goes-off frequently in operation. Unfortunately, Olympus charges very high for spares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.B.</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/olympus-fe-370-keep-it-or-toss-it/comment-page-1#comment-18637</link>
		<dc:creator>E.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=8497#comment-18637</guid>
		<description>Talk about not doing your homework -- I&#039;d think you&#039;d know that Olympus hasn&#039;t made xD-only cameras for a while. As Ron Blereau says, the FE-370 takes SD cards (the micro ones, using an included adapter.

I have no idea why you&#039;d express an opinion without having tested either camera. Did you at least read the reviews of others? Or are you psychic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about not doing your homework &#8212; I&#8217;d think you&#8217;d know that Olympus hasn&#8217;t made xD-only cameras for a while. As Ron Blereau says, the FE-370 takes SD cards (the micro ones, using an included adapter.</p>
<p>I have no idea why you&#8217;d express an opinion without having tested either camera. Did you at least read the reviews of others? Or are you psychic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Blereau</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/olympus-fe-370-keep-it-or-toss-it/comment-page-1#comment-16578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Blereau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=8497#comment-16578</guid>
		<description>The fe-370 also uses sd cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fe-370 also uses sd cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

