Why MIDs Make No Sense

notebook_divaAccessing the Internet on a mobile device makes sense. But the category of Mobile Internet Devices (or MIDs) being pioneered by Intel makes as much sense as pushing the elevator button multiple times in hopes that it will arrive faster. A market saturated with smart phones and affordable, portable netbooks just doesn’t have room for “tweener” devices like MIDs. Intel defines a MID as “the Internet experience in your pocket,” adding that it has solid mobile performance, strong wireless connectivity, and long battery life. Using the current Silverthorne class of Atom processors,  Intel has gotten both cell phone and notebook vendors to start making MIDs, which are not as small as smart phones but not as large as netbooks either. Companies like Lenovo, LG, OQO, Clarion, BenQ and others are starting to ship Wi-Fi–enabled devices (WiMAX and 3G are promised) that are a bit larger than the size of a GPS navigators (with about 4.5-7 inch displays) but cost north of $600. Think souped-up PDA, like the dated HP iPAQ. Many of them run full operating systems like Windows XP and even Vista, but others run slimmed-down Linux OSes. (Intel is hoping Moblin becomes the Linux platform of choice.) Still not sure what MIDs are? MIDs are meant to be different from smart phones in that they intended to have specific connected purposes. Intel told us that some MIDs will focus on navigation, others on multimedia (watching movies and listening to music), and a large selection on productivity (checking e-mail and reviewing PowerPoint slides, for example). But the driving force behind them all is Internet connectivity. Do consumers really want to carry around different devices for different tasks? Unless you’re big on parachute pants, it’s not the most convenient solution. And can’t you do all those things with a $199 smart phone? Applications like Google Maps and TeleNav turn your phone into a GPS navigator, and people are ditching their point-and-shoot cameras for phones like the Samsung Memoir, which sports an 8-megapixel camera. Devices that can do it all make a lot more sense than ones that do a specific task really well. Isn’t this why iPhones and Blackberrys get more popular every day? If you feel restricted by the small size of your phone, you can get along fine with a more powerful $399 netbook. Is there really room for a $500 machine that may specialize in doing one thing really well, but costs more than the average budget computer with a bigger screen and more comfortable keyboard? When it comes to getting the Internet on a mobile device, there’s a reverse Goldilocks principle at work. Instead of a MID being the “just-right” size for users who want to browse the Web on the go, the market is split between devices that are amazingly small, like the iPhone, or bigger with greater functionality, like a netbook. There just isn’t room for a middle-of-the-road device, at least not for the average consumer. So will MIDs take off? Not in their current form and price range. Perhaps wealthy individuals and businesses trying fill very particular needs will purchase MIDs, but generally speaking, people are content with their smart phones and laptops. Whether she’s roaming the streets of Taiwan or burning up the phone lines, LAPTOP News Editor Joanna Stern is responsible for getting the scoop on the latest must-have mobile gadgets.  Her Notebook Diva column appears on Tuesdays and you can follow her on Twitter.

Email* (will not be published)
*Indicates required field
Submit Comments

  1. jkkmobile Says:

    Yep, current MIDs are not ready for mainstream .. yet.

    For me the difference is having a full PC in my pocket. Many times I just don’t want to have a bag with me for a netbook, but MID ( or small UMPC ) goes with me easily without having extra weight.

    Ladies and Divas have bags with them always so maybe that’s why you don’t need one…

    .. about different tasks. For me it’s always all the computing tasks not just specific aps. MIDs and UMPCs are getting smaller and more capable and as you said mobile professionals are finding them handy..

    Here is a sample of a MID made for pro use: http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2009/02/aigo-mid-as-umpc.html

    … Current MIDs use 4.8 inch screens. 7 inchers are not pocketable..


  2. Jayayess1190 Says:

    Except the Nokia N900, I need it (wish it would come out!).

  3. Securix Says:

    I own both a netbook (Acer Aspire One) and the latest smartphone (Palm Pre) and recently got an OQO on Ebay pretty cheap now that OQO is pretty much gone.

    The netbook is great because it has a large keyboard and a decent display…but you still can’t pocket it.

    The Pre is great as a phone, a camera, a media player and for short messages (the keyboard is a nice inclusion, but it’s tiny).

    However, the OQO is perfect. It has the power of a netbook, runs any and all Windows and Linux apps (and OS X if you have the patience to get it working) and the thumboard is spread out and has good tactile feel, and I can thumb very quickly on it. Yes, it’s a little chunky and the age-old question is inevitable: “is that a MID in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?” But I can take the OQO with me, get what I need done, and not have to lug around another carrying case.

    The biggest issue with the OQO has been it’s price (and quality control on some of them). It’s too bad OQO is gone because if some other company could take it over, build the Model 2+ and sell it for less than $1500, I think the “missing” market would suddenly appear. Many of these new-generation MID’s such as Viliv’s S5 and X70 are great, inexpensive, but lack keyboards, which is something that might turn a lot of people off.

All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options