Next-Gen Browser Battle: IE 9 vs Chrome 10 vs Firefox 4


There are so many ways to measure browser performance that trying to determine which browser is fastest can leave one spinning in circles. All three of these browsers are hardware accelerated and have strong next-gen JavasScript engines. So how did they do when tested on our ASUS U36Jc with its Core i5 CPU, Nvidia 310M graphics, and 5,400 rpm hard drive?

On SunSpider, a common industry Javascript benchmark, the scores were close, with IE 9 edging out the others by about 33 milliseconds. On Mozilla’s own Kraken JavaScript benchmark, Firefox unsurprisingly did better, with a score of 6634 where lower is better.  On FutureMark’s Peacekeeper JavaScript benchmark where a higher number is better, Chrome 10 led with 9718 to IE 9’s 5840.

Browser Sunspider (ss = lower is better) Kraken (lower is better) Peacekeeper (higher is better)
IE 9 217.4 15799.5 5840
Firefox 250.3 6634 4223
Chrome 10 262.6 7370.6 9718

Graphics performance was a mixed bag. It was also hard to measure due to conflicting standards. Both Chrome 10 and Firefox 4 support the WebGL standard for hardware-accelerated 3D graphics. Therefore we were able to test both browsers on Google’s Aquarium 3D test, which shows 1,000 fish swimming in a bowl. Chrome 10 came out way ahead of Firefox with a score of 22 versus 15 fps. Since IE 9 does not support WebGL, we loaded up Microsof’ts own IE Fishbowl test  and were not surprised to find that IE9 aced Microsoft’s test by delivering 26 fps with 1,000 fish. Firefox and Chrome 10 were competitive with scores of 21 and 22 fps, respectively.

On Webvizbench, another graphics-heavy web test, IE 9 blew away the competition, scoring 28.3 fps to Firefox’s 10.98 and Chrome 10’s 7.64. However, the fact that this site shows a message asking you to download IE 9 when you first load the test tells us that it might favor Microsoft’s browser.

Browser webGL Aquarium Microsoft Aquarium Webvizbench
IE 9 N/A 26 fps 28.3 fps
Firefox 4 15 fps 21 fps 10.97 fps
Chrome 10 22 fps 22 fps 7.64 fps

Winner: Tie. In the end, all of these benchmarks leave us with more confusion than clarity. Each of the three JavaScript tests we conducted had a different winner and, in graphics tests, we saw IE 9 dominate on tests which were recommend or were built specifically for it. On a webGL-based test, Chrome outpaced Firefox by a bit, but Firefox did better on Webvizbench. We’ll have to wait for some killer HTML 5 application that works well on all three browsers to get a really good comparison.


These days, almost everyone uses more than one PC to connect to the Internet. That means multiple browsers with different settings, stored passwords, and bookmarks. Both Chrome 10 and Firefox 4 try to keep things organized with built-in synchronization services. In our tests, both services took no more than a couple of minutes to set up and immediately brought over our settings. That said, Firefox set up was a bit more complex as we also had to enable a setting on the first machine to make it sync with the second while Chrome just asked us to enter our Google account username and password.

However,  we did notice some subtle differences between Firefox 4 and Chrome 10 sync. Chrome brought over our browsing history and also added our extensions, but did not import the browser theme we had installed to our second computer until after we had restarted the browser on the second machine . Firefox brought over our persona, but not our add-ons. After a few minutes, our history still hadn’t arrived. Firefox also has a menu option you use to force the browsers to sync manually while Chrome syncs so frequently by itself that this isn’t necessary or available.

IE 9 does not have built-in sync, though Microsoft invites you to use a Windows Live Sync plug-in that it says will only sync your Favorites.

Winner: Chrome 10. While we wish Chrome 10 would have synced our browser theme more quickly, it did everything else faster and more easily than Firefox.


You really can’t go wrong with any of these browsers, and which one you choose as your main portal to the web will really depend on what is most important to you. If you want the browser that gives you the most screen real estate and the ability to get gorgeous custom Jump Lists and great privacy protection, IE 9 is for you. If you value app open speed and great sync capability, Chrome 10 is  your best choice. And, if you love to customize the look and feel of your browser, Firefox should be at the top of your list.

However, in this battle of champions, there can be only one winner. So we awarded points to all the browsers based on how they placed in each round. Here’s how we scored: 3 points for the winner, 2 for the second place, and 1 for third. By the narrowest of margins, IE 9 wins this battle. Its strong combination of performance, stand-out features, screen real estate, and speedy app opens makes it the best overall choice right now. However, as more hardware accelerated web content become available, the real performance leader may become clear and we’ll have to revisit this verdict.

Round Chrome 10 Firefox 4 IE 9
User Interface 1 3 2
Application Open Time 3 1 2
Tab Management 1 3 2
Privacy 1 2 3
Stand-Out Features 2 1 3
Performance 3 3 3
Synchronization 3 2 1
Total Points 14 15 16

Winner: IE 9

Next-Gen Browser Battle

Avram Piltch
Avram Piltch
The official Geeks Geek, as his weekly column is titled, Avram Piltch has guided the editorial and production of since 2007. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram programmed several of LAPTOP's real-world benchmarks, including the LAPTOP Battery Test. He holds a master’s degree in English from NYU.
Avram Piltch on
Facebook Twitter Google+
Email* (will not be published)
*Indicates required field
Submit Comments

  1. br1 Says:

    what about webgl? :)

  2. Benz145 Says:

    Hey Avram, great comparison of browser. I’d like to suggest two sections that could be added to the performance section. Both are about standards compatibility (which IE has historically been horrible with). Try these:


  3. Raul Says:

    Chrome 10 does have the ability to pin app tabs to the far left of the browser tabs; I E 9 does too. How can you say it does not? Just right click the tab.

  4. Techy Says:

    Why didn’t you guys test out Opera?

  5. Techy Says:

    In addition, Google Chrome also has the pin tab feature, if you right-click the tab there’s an option that says “pin tab”

  6. Techy Says:

    which means if you were to revise the “tab management” portion it would give Google Chrome an extra point while Internet Explorer 9 loses a point. So in the end they are all tied, no winner

  7. justsomename Says:

    Hmm, this is a rather poor comparison, methinks.

    The IE9 Pin feature is very superficial. Desktop integration is important, sure, but in a much more productive way than this. I’ve tried this feature, and it’s basically nothing more than a glorified ‘bookmarks’ section, except on your taskbar (which is already crowded to begin with).

    IE9 is still a bucket of fail, as it has not improved its compatibility well enough to be considered a decent browser. Their CSS3 support is shoddy at best, and a long way off… Which would matter to me a lot more than any of these tests. The lack of WebGL is another large piece that is missing.

    Not worth using yet, imho- or ever for that matter. FF & Chrome have been on the right track for a good while; IE is playing catch-up. After a long-standing history of horrible security, on top of poor compatibility, it’ll be some time before anyone considers IE seriously (Not to mention, it is not platform agnostic for obvious reasons- big minus right there).

    And yes, like Techy asked: Why not test Opera? I’m all for FF & Chrome. They are excellent browsers. However in terms of security Opera trumps all.

  8. Edward Says:

    Firefox do sync your browser history and also your tabs opened, and chrome not, and this is very helpful

  9. Adam Williamson Says:

    As Edward notes, Firefox Sync does sync browser history. The first sync will take a bit of time if you have a large history, after that it’ll be fast. You can go to the special URL about:sync-log to track Sync.

    “That said, Firefox set up was a bit more complex as we also had to enable a setting on the first machine to make it sync with the second while Chrome just asked us to enter our Google account username and password.”

    It’s worth noting that this is because Firefox’s Sync is designed much better, from a security and privacy perspective, than Google’s. Firefox Sync does not actually require the backend to be Mozilla’s servers, and it encrypts _all_ data on the client end, so the server never sees anything but encrypted data. This is why the setup is slightly more complicated. They’ve actually done a heroic job of simplifying things as much as possible without taking out the privacy; if you used earlier versions you’ll have had the fun of thinking up and entering, onto each system you wanted to sync, both a server password and an encryption passphrase.

  10. Johannes Says:

    What about mentionning that only Firefox and Chrome are cross-platform, and that Firefox is free software?
    IE9 belongs to Microsoft, Chrome to Google (Chromium is free sotware), but Firefox belongs to you and me, to humanity.

  11. siavash Says:

    recomment :Why didn’t you guys test out Opera?

  12. mzarate Says:

    I agree with Ben.

    As browsers become more powerful they in turn empower web developers to put more powerful and desirable web apps in front of users. However, that’s not possible, or at a minimum becomes frustrating and problematic, when browsers fail to prioritize inter-operable mark up needs along w/standards compliance. That reason alone is why web developers and browser vendors (aside from MS, of course) fail to recognize IE as a worthy platform for web development.

    Another important thing to consider is the rate of change browser vendors get new standards and features to market, another area IE lacks in horribly. Chrome obviously leads the pack in that area w/their aggressive release cycles, but Firefox certainly can’t be overlooked either (despite the slower than anticipated time to market for Firefox 4).

    Overall I love the competition between browsers, but IMO IE has done too much damage to the web’s ecosystem for me to take IE 9 seriously right out of the gate. Web developers still have IE 7 and IE 8 to deal with for years to come, which is very unfortunate.

  13. Michael Says:

    I agree with Benz that html5 and acid tests would have been very useful — much more important than the milliseconds measured in JavaScript benchmarks in my opinion.

    Also, I strongly disagree with your assessment of the user interface. IE9 crams the tabs and address bar onto the same line, which doesn’t really leave sufficient room for either. In doing this, they only managed to save 7-10px (which definitely isn’t another full line of text)! Just from looking at your screenshot, you can see that IE9 has a huge amount of empty, wasted space at the top of the window.

    Other than those two points, I definitely enjoyed reading your assessment. It will be interesting to see where things are a year from now. Well, IE9 will probably be in the same place, but there should be several new releases of Chrome and Firefox by then. :-p

  14. Sid Says:

    1) Firefox is cross platform. They don’t have any business on which they can use our browsing data to capitalize on.

    2) Opera is a really good browser and its verdict should have been given.

    Where did the add-ons part go? Firefox offers tons of them.

    I have written a quick review on all the browsers on my blog at

    Follow me on @crazywebs.

    Firefox 4 on Facebook

  15. Gary Says:

    I see a custom jumplist in Chrome, but you say it’s unique to IE9? And, the tab panorama feature sounds a lot like the Quick Tabs feature that IE7 introduced. Does IE9 no longer have that?

  16. Gus Says:

    The best thing today is the most important browser are all designed to be good for the developers AND users. Even IE, after such a long history of fail, is now trying to restore some dignity (and let´s be frank: it may be not the best choice, it is no more the joke it used to be). I really missed the Opera in this review, and I only used it for barely a week. Also, I missed a category about external customization (addons, plugins and the like), but this is excusable, given that though Chrome has a good share of them, and Opera is still too new (promising, true, but new), Firefox still doesn’t has much of a competition in that area. A fair analysis though, despite the aforementioned details.

  17. Gecko Says:

    @Sid Wrong. Firefox is open-source. Type about:rights on your firefox and you will see.

  18. G. Love Says:

    Really unfortunate that Opera 11 was not included in this.

  19. McRoberts Says:

    A battery-life or power-usage test with each browser would be nice.

  20. Crupted Says:

    Snip from the 2009 Mozilla Foundation audited accounts (Note 9) “The Corporation has a contract with a search engine provider for royalties which expires November 2011. Approximately 86% and 91% of royalty revenue for 2009 and 2008 respectively was derived from this contract.” In the same document it reports royalties of $101m in 2009 and $83.6m in 2008. It does not mention the “search engine provider” by name, but it is pretty unlikley it is Bing. It is probably the one on the default home page of FF. So we have 3 browsers here (where is Opera btw?), one is from Microsoft and the other two? – maybe one is built by Google and the other one funded by Google? I am not sure how that makes FF “belongs to you me, to humanity” Johannes, I have got a feeling they are loyal to the mouth that feeds them.

  21. Vineeth Says:

    very incomprehensive

  22. Chris Says:

    IE9 is still a epic failure in my opinion. Even there was the overhaul on the interface itself, it does still shows the almost exactly the same flaws on the IE8.

  23. Alex Says:

    You award IE 9 some points because it has the “unique” feature of displaying your most visited websites when opening a new tab? Have you ever used Chrome and opened a new tab? You get your most visited, recently closed, and a small link to the app store.

  24. Darren Says:

    Amazing how you claim some browsers don’t have other features that other browsers have, when they do… Please at-least use the browsers you are comparing before saying they don’t do certain things.

    Terrible comparison.

All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options