Netbook Madness Game 7: Dell Inspiron Mini 9 vs. MSI Wind U120
March 26th, 2009 by Michael A. Prospero, LAPTOP Reviews Editor
Yesterday’s game, between the ASUS EeePC S101 and the Samsung NC20, was pretty exciting: There was back and forth action all day. Although the NC20 took an early lead yesterday afternoon, the S101 dominated late, racking up 27,886 votes to the NC20′s 14,138. Apparently, these are two very popular netbooks. Today, we have the MSI Wind U120 facing off against the Dell Inspiron Mini 9. Like its predecessor, the U100, the U120 also has an Intel Atom processor, 160GB hard drive, and 1 GB of RAM. However, its low price of $379–now, even cheaper–was very attractive, as was its updated chassis. The U120′s keyboard is plenty roomy, but we were disappointed with its stiff mouse buttons. Also included is MSI’s EasyFace Manager software, which lets users log in with just their faces. Unlike the U100, though, the U120 is not upgradeable, which is a bummer. Also, its six-cell battery lasted just 4:28, which is about 45 minutes less than the U100, and 1:12 minutes less than the six-cell average for netbooks. While it has a smaller 9-inch screen, the Dell Inspiron Mini 9 has a lot going for it. Even though it came out several months before the U120, it too, has a 1.6-GHz Intel Atom processor and 1GB of RAM. It’s also one of the lightest netbooks on the market, weighing just 3.2 pounds. Like Dell’s other mini-notebook offerings, the Mini 9 has a classy look. However, unlike its larger bretheren, the keyboard, while comfortable to type on, has a few awkwardly placed keys. The Mini 9 that we reviewed had Dell’s version of Ubuntu Linux installed, which we found more attractive and useful than Eee PC’s Xandros and Acer’s Linpus Linux Lite. Coupled with a 4GB SSD, this unit initially cost $399, but now costs just $274–and that’s with a larger 8GB SSD. For the Linux-phobic, a Mini 9 with Windows XP, 1GB of RAM, and a 16GB SSD will set you back $374. Dell also offers integrated mobile broadband through AT&T for an additional $125. The Mini 9′s 4-cell battery lasted 3 hours and 12 minutes, about half an hour longer than the average for netbooks with batteries that are less than six cells in size. So which will it be? The U120 and its larger screen and battery, or the Mini 9 and its excellent portability, low cost, and Linux OS? Update (3/27): And it’s the Dell Inspiron Mini 9! Stay tuned for today’s matchup between the Acer Aspire One AOD150 and the Asus N10J-A2. 
Our Related Content
- Netbook Madness Finals: The Asus EeePC 1000HE Routs Samsung
- Netbook Madness Finals Resume: Asus EeePC 1000HE vs. Samsung NC10
- Netbook Madness Game 14: Asus EeePC 1000HE vs. Asus N10J-A2
From Other Sites
- LG Renews Prada Partnership to Bring Designer Android Phone (GottaBeMobile)
- Motorola RAZR Gets Slight Redesign for China (GottaBeMobile)
- HTC grabs lead in US smartphone sales (SlashGear)
Related Deals
- HP Pavilion dv6 Quad Edition Core i7 "Sandy Bridge" Laptop w/8GB RAM, 750GB HDD & Blu-ray $770.49 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- Samsung NP300V4A Series 3 14-inch Core i5 Laptop + $50 Amazon Gift Card $549.99 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- HP Pavilion dv6t 15.6-inch "Sandy Bridge" Core i3 2.2GHz Laptop w/Free 6GB RAM Upgrade $529.99 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- HP Pavilion dm1 11.6-inch 1.6GHz Dual-core AMD Fusion Laptop w/4GB RAM $374.99 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- HP Pavilion g6z 2.5GHz Dual-core AMD Laptop w/6GB RAM [AMD A8 Quad-core $504] $439.99 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)












March 26th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Some things listed above don’t make much sense to me. The Dell mini 9 is 3.2lbs. and yet someone thought it warrants a comment of “one of the lightest netbooks on the market”. For a 8.9″ model that sound like it is more on the heavy site, even more so when you consider that the Asus 1000HE weights the same amount and is considered one of the bulkiest 10″ models available. The U120 weights less at 2.8lbs. with it’s 6 cell battery. The statement doesn’t make any sense to me.
Some better comments might have been that the U120 still offers the overclocking ability, the much larger and easier to use keyboard, etc..
Also, it seems strange that this issue has never been mentioned in any MSI wind review (U100 or U120), but I believe the reason the battery life of the U120 was less than the originally reviewed U100 is because MSI decided at some point to change the battery to a 4200mAh battery instead of the original 5200mAh battery. You can no longer purchase a Wind (U100 or U120) with a 5200mAh battery. So most likely the initial U100 review had a 5200mAh battery and is why the battery life is better than what new U100/U120 owners are able to get. New purchasers seem to report closer to what was measured in your U120 review, which makes sense since that review used the smaller battery.