Hot on the heels of the Asus Eee PC 1005PE-P, MSI has announced its Pine Trail-based netbook, the Wind U135. The two designs are actually remarkably similar, but the U135 is more of a value play at $329, while the Asus costs $379. What do you get for $50 less? About half as much battery life.
This system features a 1.66-GHz Intel Atom N450 processor, a 250GB, 5,400-rpm hard drive, 1GB of RAM, and Windows 7 Starter. Read on for our hands-on impressions of the U135 and to see how it did on our tests.
When we first opened the lid of the U135, we thought we received a second 1005PE-P by mistake, and with good reason: The two keyboards are almost identical, and both have a single mouse bar as opposed to discrete buttons. We wonder if the two companies shop at the same supplier. Neverthless, the U135 was just as comfortable to type on as the 1005PE.
The U135′s battery sticks out the bottom of the system; while not as egregious as the Wind U110, it is more noticeable than other netbooks with 6-cell batteries, and made the U135 feel a bit bulkier than other netbooks, even though it weighs 2.8 pounds. Once inside our messenger bag, it disappeared like every other system of its size and weight.
While our U135 came in a dark blue, consumers will also be able to get the system in silver, red, or black. A way line pattern on the lid is also repeated on the touchpad, which adds a nice graphical element to the design.
In our performance tests, the U135 and the Eee PC 1005PE ran neck and neck. In PCMark05, the U135 scored 1418 to the 1005PE’s 1,410. Both scores are south of the netbook average (1498). In 3DMark06, the U135 scored 154, the same as the Asus netbook, and a shade below the average of 160.
The U135 was a bit more lethargic in our file transfer test, copying a 4.97GB folder of multimedia in 5 minutes and 6 seconds, a rate of 16.6 MBps, which is nearly 10 MBps slower than the 1005PE, but a hair above the netbook average.
The one area where the U135 disappointed us was in battery life. In our preliminary test (Web surfing via Wi-Fi), the U135′s 6-cell battery saw just 5 hours and 35 minutes, which is about 40 minutes less than the 6-cell netbook average, an hour less than MSI’s claim, and 5 hours less than the 1005PE. We’ll be running the test again to confirm.
In sum, the Wind U135 looks and performs well for a netbook, keeping pace with its bretheren. However, battery life takes a step back, especially considering that the Atom N450 is supposed to offer 20 percent greater endurance than the previous generation of Atom chips. We’d certainly cough up the extra $50 for the Asus Eee PC 1005PE, and get those extra 5 hours of work and play time.
Our Related Content
- Pine Trail Showdown: What's the Best 10-inch Netbook?
- Intel: Nvidia Ion is Overkill, Smartbooks Not Versatile Enough
- Dell Debuts Redesigned Inspiron Mini 10 with Atom N450
From Other Sites
- Samsung Introduces Colorful Versions of N150 Netbook (Notebooks.com)
- Averatec N1200 claims to be thinnest and lightest netbook (Notebooks.com)
- Fujitsu LifeBook MH380 Review (Notebooks.com)
Related Deals
- Dell Vostro 1520 15.4-in Core 2 Duo 2.2GHz Laptop w/ 9-cell battery $549 (via LogicBUY)
- Toshiba Satellite A660-BT2G22 16-in Quad Core i7-740QM Laptop w/ 1GB GeForce GT 330M $999 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- Toshiba Satellite L670-BT2N22 17.3-inch Core i3 / i5 Customizable Laptop $679 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- Dell Inspiron 17 (1764) 2.26GHz Core i5 17-inch Laptop $829.99 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- Dell Latitude 2110 10.1-in Atom 1.83GHz Netbook w/ Ubuntu, 16GB SSD $404 (via LogicBUY)
4 Responses to “MSI Wind U135: First Impressions and Test Results”
Leave a Reply
Featured Sponsors |
|||
|
|
|
|
|










December 21st, 2009 by Mike Prospero













December 22nd, 2009 at 12:50 pm
In the pictures the screen of Asus Eee PC 1005PE-P looks way brighter than the screen of MSI Wind U135. It might be different brightness settings or the angle at which the pictures are taken, but if the screen of the Asus is indeed better, it would definitely make it the better choice, plus the much better battery life, of course.
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:55 pm
I’ve checked the pictures of Asus Eee PC 1005PE-P in another online review, the screen does not look as impressive there. Perhaps you just took the shot at the best angle.
December 22nd, 2009 at 2:51 pm
Milen – The screens on both notebooks are about the same brightness. The difference you see is due to the photos.
December 23rd, 2009 at 9:42 pm
Pine trail is junk no better than the previous atom..