Kindle Fire's Silk Browser Still Slower With Cloud Acceleration Enabled

Kindle Fire’s Silk Browser 25 Percent Slower with Cloud Acceleration On

 Kindle Fire Browser

One of the big selling points of the Kindle Fire is the device’s unique Silk web browser. According to Amazon, it uses the power of Amazon’s EC2 cloud computing cluster to accelerate your page downloads. The only problem is that, over two weeks after the Fire first shipped, our tests show that the Silk browser is a lot faster with its acceleration feature disabled. What’s going on?

When we first tested the Kindle Fire on November 14th, we found four popular websites loading significantly faster with Silk’s acceleration feature turned off.  Businessweek.com, for example, took 16.5 seconds to load with acceleration on, but only 8 seconds with it off.  

Considering that Silk’s acceleration works by remotely caching web files that users access most, we were willing to give Amazon the benefit of the doubt during our review. After all, the Fire had just started shipping when we tested it and EC2 hadn’t had much of an opportunity to learn from user behavior.

Now that two weeks have passed, millions of  of Kindle Fires have shipped and presumably most of those devices have been used for web browsing (with the exception of those units waiting under the tree). So you’d think that Silk’s acceleration feature would finally speed up download times. That’s not the case. In a series of tests conducted today, we found that Silk is still a great deal slower with cloud acceleration than without. 

Methodology

Just this afternoon, we whipped out our Kindle Fire and timed the loads of seven popular sites, with acceleration on and off. We also timed the sites when using Opera Mobile on the Fire and when using the default Android browser on a Galaxy Tab 7 plus. In each case, we set the browsers to load the desktop versions of the sites and disabled Flash. We loaded each site three times, used a stop watch to keep track of when each page loaded, and took the average of the load times as the final time for that site.

All the tests were conducted during the afternoon of November 29, 2011 in our New York office, connecting to the same office router, which leads to the same office mobile broadband. All times are in seconds so lower numbers are better.

Results

Site Silk (acceleration on) Silk (acceleration off) Opera Mobile Galaxy Tab 7 Plus
Businessweek 15 13 12 12
Cars.com 14 9 10 7
Engadget 20 15 18 19
ESPN 9 6 11 8
Laptopmag 14 8 12 7
NY Times 11 10 7 8
People.com 10 8 6 7
Average 13.3 9.9 10.9 9.7

As of this afternoon, on average, the Silk browser is 25 percent faster with acceleration turned off. With acceleration turned off, the delta between Silk and the stock browser on the Galaxy Tab 7 Plus, which uses Android 3.2 instead of the Fire’s Android 2.3 as its base, is so minimal as to be irrelevant. And Opera Mobile is apparently a little slower on average than Silk with acceleration disabled, but it actually loaded a few sites — People.com, for example — faster than the others. 

Average Page Load

Considering that the Fire comes with Silk’s acceleration feature enabled by default, a lot of users who don’t know better are going to experience significantly slower browsing than they do on their smartphones or on other tablets. Fortunately, it should take users no more than a few seconds to disable acceleration.

We hope Silk gets better, but thus far Amazon hasn’t made good on its promise to provide a faster browsing experience. We reached out to the company for comment, but have yet to receive a response. 

David Eitelbach contributed to this report.

AUTHOR BIO
Avram Piltch
Avram Piltch
The official Geeks Geek, as his weekly column is titled, Avram Piltch has guided the editorial and production of Laptopmag.com since 2007. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram programmed several of LAPTOP's real-world benchmarks, including the LAPTOP Battery Test. He holds a master’s degree in English from NYU.
Avram Piltch on
Facebook Twitter Google+
LEAVE A REPLY
Name*
Email* (will not be published)
Website
*Indicates required field
Comments*
Submit Comments

FIND A REVIEW
Laptops
All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Brand
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating Editor's Choice 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
Resolution
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options
SUBSCRIBE