iPhone 3G S Smokes the iPhone 3G In Every Speed Test: Over 2X Faster
June 19th, 2009 by Todd Haselton
The iPhone 3G S (S is for Speed) arrived in our offices today, and the first thing we wanted to find out was how much “Speed,” that ‘S’ really added to the new iPhone. Like a fine wine, the iPhone 3G S should improve with age. That’s because it supports AT&T’s new 7.2Mbps HSPA network, which has not fully rolled out yet. Even still, we’ve seen massive speed improvements over the original iPhone 3G. And why shouldn’t we? That phone is said to have a speed cap around 1.4Mbps, far below the maximum throughput of the 3G S, and the new iPhone also has a zippier 600MHz processor. We put the new iPhone against the 3G in head to head tests to find out just how much “Speed,” the 3G S offers. Our first trial was loading the New York Times’ full HTML home page in our office and then again on the ground. Next we ran the SpeedTest.net iPhone application to get some hard data on just how fast our download and upload speeds were. Finally, we loaded the Associated Press iPhone application to see how much faster the processor could launch an app. Web Results On the 21st floor of our building, the iPhone 3G S loaded the New York Times homepage in just 21 seconds, while the iPhone 3G was chugging along past the 40 second mark before we decided to stop the test. In previous runs, we found that the iPhone 3G loaded NYT.com in about 50 seconds and the Palm Pre loaded it in 33 seconds. Next we averaged the load times on the ground in a moving vehicle. The iPhone 3G loaded NYT.com in an average of 40 seconds while the iPhone 3G S had an average load time of just 17 seconds. That’s a 23 second difference, and an indicator that the iPhone 3G S is about 57.5 percent faster than the 3G in Web surfing tests. That’s zippy but not quite the claim Apple made that the phone would load the New York Times 2.9X faster, but as AT&T rolls out 7.2HSPA we’ll likely see even more improvements. Speed Test Results In our office and using SpeedTest.net, we found that the iPhone 3G S had a peak download speed of 344Kbps while the iPhone 3G capped out at 104Kbps. That test yielded about a [[Update: 230 percent increase]] in performance, but that was on the 21st floor of our building. Out on the ground, the iPhone 3G S capped out at an impressive 1155Kbps, which is comparable to what you would find with your mobile broadband card. App Load Speeds We launched the Associated Press application at the exact samet time on both phones, then counted until the full News page loaded.This test should have measured both of the device’s ability to launch and application and then download the content inside. The iPhone 3G S finished in just 3.2 seconds while the iPhone 3G took a full 13 seconds to completely load the application. By those results, the iPhone 3G S is about 75.4 percent faster than the 3G.
Check out our video below for the in-office results of our tests.
Our Related Content
- Free iPhone 3GS Available Today at Best Buy
- What Back-to-School Tech Can You Score for $209?
- Best Smartphones Under $50
From Other Sites
Related Deals
- HP ENVY 14 Beats edition 14.5-inch Intel 2nd Gen Core i5 Laptop [Core i7 $949] $849.99 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- HP ENVY 14 Intel 2nd Core i5 2.4GHz Laptop [Core i7 $899] $799.99 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- HP Mini 210 10.1-in 1.6GHz Dual-core Intel Atom Netbook $299.99 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- Dell Vostro 3555 AMD E2-3000M 2.4GHz Dual-core 15.6-in Laptop $439 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)
- Sony VAIO VPCEH37FX/W 15.5-in Core i5 2.5GHz Laptop (Glacier White) + $200 MS Store Coupon $699 FREE SHIPPING (via LogicBUY)











June 19th, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Palm Pre is faster than iphone 3gs in real world tests web browsing and emailing pictures.
http://cnettv.cnet.com/speed-test-apple-iphone-3g-vs-palm-pre/9742-1_53-50073193.html
June 21st, 2009 at 9:08 pm
I think your math is off on all of your calculations. For example, 344-104=240. 240/104=2.30 That ratio translates into a 230% increase in speed or faster by a factor of 3.3 (344/104=3.3) (in reference to the download times from inside your office)
June 22nd, 2009 at 9:53 am
You’re right, thanks Stephen