Intel Confirms Atom Will Cost More for Netbook Makers Who Embrace ION

ion-introDuring a conference call today to discuss Intel’s whopping $1.45 billion fine from the European Commission over its alleged anti-competitive practices to exclude AMD, CEO Paul Otellini confirmed what I have suspected for months, something  that could prevent Nvidia’s promising ION technology from taking off. Until now we had heard only rumors that Intel was charging more for the Atom processor by itself than it does for the Atom CPU and its corresponding chipset. In fact, many netbook vendors have told us off the record that this higher cost has been the primary reason for them being skittish about embracing Nvidia’s ION platform. ION pairs Atom with Nvidia’s 9400M graphics, which is supposed to provide a major performance boost for netbooks without taking much of a toll on battery life. In answer to my question as to whether Intel is charging more for the Atom CPU versus Atom plus the chipset, Otellini said “We have historically offered better pricing to people who buy more product.” That could be bad news for Nvidia. Off the record, several OEMs have told us that, while it’s possible to purchase the Atom CPU + chipset package and then swap in an ION chipset, the process is time and cost prohibitive. During an earlier interview with Nvidia, their CEO told us that ION would add only about $50 to the cost of a netbook. That still may be true on paper, but if OEMs are forced to pay considerably more for Atom CPUs by their lonsesome,  it will force netbook makers to think twice about ION. Is this practice anti-competitive? Intel doesn’t think so. But I bet you Nvidia would beg to differ.

Mark Spoonauer
Mark Spoonauer
Responsible for the editorial vision for Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide, Mark Spoonauer has been Editor in Chief of LAPTOP since 2003 and has covered technology for nearly 15 years. Mark speaks at key tech industry events and makes regular media appearances on CNBC, Fox and CNN. Mark was previously reviews editor at Mobile Computing, and his work has appeared in Wired, Popular Science and Inc.
Mark Spoonauer on
Twitter Google+
Email* (will not be published)
*Indicates required field
Submit Comments

  1. Nicolas Grignon Says:

    Disgusting practices…. Intel shareholders should fire their heads and ally with nvidia to make BETTER graphic ships instead of blackmailing nvidia and still produce crappy graphic chipsets.

  2. NeoteriX Says:

    Revealing anti-competitive practices at your conference to dispute the verdict that your company engaged in anti-competitive practices? Oh irony, how I love your sweet, sweet embrace.

  3. bri Says:

    I hate Intel… they’re so anti-netbooks >:(

  4. Anonymous Says:

    We’ll see after Computex in early June.

  5. br Says:

    Intel is the new Microsoft (yeah, old news…)

All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options