<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP Mini 110 Hands-on Verdict: Most Improved Netbook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/hp-mini-110-mini-review-verdict-most-improved-netbook/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hp-mini-110-mini-review-verdict-most-improved-netbook</link>
	<description>News and views on today&#039;s hottest laptops, cell phones, and other mobile devices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanfoot</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hp-mini-110-mini-review-verdict-most-improved-netbook/comment-page-1#comment-20593</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=15950#comment-20593</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think the Mini 1000 is kind of unique.  Stupid trackpad buttons of course, but the thin profile, great keyboard, and nice aesthetics kept it from being a me-too product.  And that stupid mini-VGA connector, exacerbated by HP&#039;s delays in getting the adapter cable out the door.  And the 1.8&quot; drive at 4,200rpm was not exactly a speed demon, but the SSD option was a good choice.  I continue to think SSDs fit really well with what a netbook is supposed to be (e.g. close the lid and go, don&#039;t have to wait for the hard drive to stop spinning).

I think having this as an alternative to the Mini for some people might be a good choice.  But personally I wouldn&#039;t consider the new model.  I want my next netbook to be 1&quot; thick at most.  Hoping for something along the lines of the 1008HA but maybe with Pineview and Windows 7 in the second half of the year.  Maybe they&#039;ll have the HD Flash issue worked out by then (c&#039;mon Adobe!).  Probably going to want higher resolution than the 1024x600 display on my Mini 9 though.  Like to hear more from you guys about how squinty the 720p 10&quot; displays are.  Might have to go with an 11&quot; display if those materialize at the right price point in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think the Mini 1000 is kind of unique.  Stupid trackpad buttons of course, but the thin profile, great keyboard, and nice aesthetics kept it from being a me-too product.  And that stupid mini-VGA connector, exacerbated by HP&#8217;s delays in getting the adapter cable out the door.  And the 1.8&#8243; drive at 4,200rpm was not exactly a speed demon, but the SSD option was a good choice.  I continue to think SSDs fit really well with what a netbook is supposed to be (e.g. close the lid and go, don&#8217;t have to wait for the hard drive to stop spinning).</p>
<p>I think having this as an alternative to the Mini for some people might be a good choice.  But personally I wouldn&#8217;t consider the new model.  I want my next netbook to be 1&#8243; thick at most.  Hoping for something along the lines of the 1008HA but maybe with Pineview and Windows 7 in the second half of the year.  Maybe they&#8217;ll have the HD Flash issue worked out by then (c&#8217;mon Adobe!).  Probably going to want higher resolution than the 1024&#215;600 display on my Mini 9 though.  Like to hear more from you guys about how squinty the 720p 10&#8243; displays are.  Might have to go with an 11&#8243; display if those materialize at the right price point in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Spoonauer</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hp-mini-110-mini-review-verdict-most-improved-netbook/comment-page-1#comment-20577</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Spoonauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=15950#comment-20577</guid>
		<description>We have measured it and it&#039;s indeed thicker and heavier. I&#039;ll be updating this post and full review will go live soon. This Mini 110 is indeed much improved but there are better netbooks for the money in the 10-inch category. I, too, miss the edge to edge glass screen. The N280 doesn&#039;t provide much of a performance boost at all. I would rather see ION added here, as opposed to single-purpose Broadcom accelerator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have measured it and it&#8217;s indeed thicker and heavier. I&#8217;ll be updating this post and full review will go live soon. This Mini 110 is indeed much improved but there are better netbooks for the money in the 10-inch category. I, too, miss the edge to edge glass screen. The N280 doesn&#8217;t provide much of a performance boost at all. I would rather see ION added here, as opposed to single-purpose Broadcom accelerator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pimlicosound</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hp-mini-110-mini-review-verdict-most-improved-netbook/comment-page-1#comment-20564</link>
		<dc:creator>pimlicosound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=15950#comment-20564</guid>
		<description>I agree, Fanfoot.  This new model looks much thicker, particularly towards the rear.  That seems like a real step backwards, as does the inferior finish and the lack of a glass overlay on the screen (which, controversially, I happen to like).

I like the promise of an HD video decoding chip and of a high-resolution display, but why haven&#039;t they included the newer N280 Atom CPU?

I think the title of &quot;Most Improved Netbook&quot; is a little hasty.  HP have made a lot of compromises here, to the extent I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s any better than the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Fanfoot.  This new model looks much thicker, particularly towards the rear.  That seems like a real step backwards, as does the inferior finish and the lack of a glass overlay on the screen (which, controversially, I happen to like).</p>
<p>I like the promise of an HD video decoding chip and of a high-resolution display, but why haven&#8217;t they included the newer N280 Atom CPU?</p>
<p>I think the title of &#8220;Most Improved Netbook&#8221; is a little hasty.  HP have made a lot of compromises here, to the extent I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s any better than the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanfoot</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hp-mini-110-mini-review-verdict-most-improved-netbook/comment-page-1#comment-20555</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=15950#comment-20555</guid>
		<description>You sure about that thickness staying the same?  It doesn&#039;t look as thin as the 1000 in your photos, and other sites are not reporting the thickness as being the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sure about that thickness staying the same?  It doesn&#8217;t look as thin as the 1000 in your photos, and other sites are not reporting the thickness as being the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

