<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hands On With Google&#8217;s Chrome Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser</link>
	<description>News and views on today&#039;s hottest laptops, cell phones, and other mobile devices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:36:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser/comment-page-1#comment-12687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=3833#comment-12687</guid>
		<description>How do you edit the title of your most visited thumbnails?
All my servers have management sites as well as my SANs. They all show up as &quot;HP System Management...&quot; I can&#039;t tell them apart. 

Thanx,
JimA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you edit the title of your most visited thumbnails?<br />
All my servers have management sites as well as my SANs. They all show up as &#8220;HP System Management&#8230;&#8221; I can&#8217;t tell them apart. </p>
<p>Thanx,<br />
JimA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser/comment-page-1#comment-12684</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=3833#comment-12684</guid>
		<description>You can also view the full history of pages by opening a new tab (Ctrl + T) and clicking on &quot;show full history;&quot; granted, the list will only contain the sites that have been stored in the cache since it was last emptied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also view the full history of pages by opening a new tab (Ctrl + T) and clicking on &#8220;show full history;&#8221; granted, the list will only contain the sites that have been stored in the cache since it was last emptied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser/comment-page-1#comment-12681</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=3833#comment-12681</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why, for instance, is there no mechanism for reopening closed tabs, as there is in both Firefox 3 and Internet Explorer 8?&quot;

Recently closed tabs are listed on the &#039;New Tab&#039; page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why, for instance, is there no mechanism for reopening closed tabs, as there is in both Firefox 3 and Internet Explorer 8?&#8221;</p>
<p>Recently closed tabs are listed on the &#8216;New Tab&#8217; page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomascco</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser/comment-page-1#comment-12669</link>
		<dc:creator>tomascco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=3833#comment-12669</guid>
		<description>Safari? Gimme a break? I&#039;m on a Mac and even I don&#039;t use Safari! I just stuck Chrome on my VMWare partition and so far it flies pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari? Gimme a break? I&#8217;m on a Mac and even I don&#8217;t use Safari! I just stuck Chrome on my VMWare partition and so far it flies pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser/comment-page-1#comment-12666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=3833#comment-12666</guid>
		<description>And why exactly would Safari be the obvious comparison? It doesn&#039;t have a fraction of the users IE and FF have and the only &#039;mobile&#039; device with Safari is the iPhone?  Which is what this browser will appease best of all - netbook and internet devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And why exactly would Safari be the obvious comparison? It doesn&#8217;t have a fraction of the users IE and FF have and the only &#8216;mobile&#8217; device with Safari is the iPhone?  Which is what this browser will appease best of all &#8211; netbook and internet devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallcomputing</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser/comment-page-1#comment-12663</link>
		<dc:creator>smallcomputing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=3833#comment-12663</guid>
		<description>It sounds like the browser has some promise, especially considering this is day one of the beta. While I appreciate the comparisons to FF3 and IE8, I&#039;m wondering why the most obvious comparison was left out: Safari.

Still, the way it handles tabs sounds interesting and I love the idea that it&#039;ll show you nitty gritty statistics (memory usage). I&#039;ll definitely give it a try and see how it performs, both on my MBP and my netbook(s).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like the browser has some promise, especially considering this is day one of the beta. While I appreciate the comparisons to FF3 and IE8, I&#8217;m wondering why the most obvious comparison was left out: Safari.</p>
<p>Still, the way it handles tabs sounds interesting and I love the idea that it&#8217;ll show you nitty gritty statistics (memory usage). I&#8217;ll definitely give it a try and see how it performs, both on my MBP and my netbook(s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-on-with-googles-chrome-browser/comment-page-1#comment-12662</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=3833#comment-12662</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s something you&#039;re forgetting.  Some of us can&#039;t run Fox 3.  I tried and it was slow as frozen molasses on my PC.  I had to drop back to Fox 2.  So I was very skeptical of Chrome on my old, underpowered RAM-limited hardware.  But I&#039;ve been banging on Chrome *hard* and it&#039;s like having a new PC!  I can open *double* the number of Tabs than Fox 2 and everything is generally so damned fast that it&#039;s taking my breath away.  I also got the first error message:
http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-browser-first-error-message/

If I could get the same plug-ins I need with Fox 2 -- like Twitterfox -- I&#039;d switch to Chrome permanently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something you&#8217;re forgetting.  Some of us can&#8217;t run Fox 3.  I tried and it was slow as frozen molasses on my PC.  I had to drop back to Fox 2.  So I was very skeptical of Chrome on my old, underpowered RAM-limited hardware.  But I&#8217;ve been banging on Chrome *hard* and it&#8217;s like having a new PC!  I can open *double* the number of Tabs than Fox 2 and everything is generally so damned fast that it&#8217;s taking my breath away.  I also got the first error message:<br />
<a href="http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-browser-first-error-message/" rel="nofollow">http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-browser-first-error-message/</a></p>
<p>If I could get the same plug-ins I need with Fox 2 &#8212; like Twitterfox &#8212; I&#8217;d switch to Chrome permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
