Hands On With Google’s Chrome Browser

Not content to take over the world, Google has just released its own desktop browser, Chrome. The browser which is in beta, doesn’t exactly take aim at Firefox 3, but, as a fellow open source project, it does draw both features and design elements from it. Far from being a Mozilla clone, though, Chrome aims to provide superior integration with Web apps and searching, particularly Google’s own wide range of services. For example, the address bar doubles as a search bar, creating a simpler interface. Users can also download desktop shortcuts for Web-based apps, such as Gmail, and launch them that way. I downloaded the beta shortly after it went live to see if its claimed speeds are worth ditching a more mature Firefox for.  Downloading the 476KB setup file took seconds, as did installing it. Almost immediately, it imported all of my bookmarks and settings from Firefox 3, my default browser. The first thing you’ll notice is that the interface is reminiscent of Firefox 3. Although this has one bar, whereas Firefox has address and search bars, both have autocompletion, with an empty star next to each site, which users can click to mark it as a favorite. Although the default search engine is Google, you can choose another, if you like (the options include Yahoo, AOL, Live Search, and Ask). See below for a screen of the autocomplete in action.   Otherwise, the interface is pretty sparse. I like the clean blue-and-white color scheme. There’s your usual favorite bar beneath the address bar, and a slew of buttons aligned with the address bar, including back, forward, refresh, and customize buttons. There’s also a button whose rollover label says, “Control the current page.” This includes all your standard options: copying, cutting, pasting, opening a new window, et cetera. It does seem weird that there’s no icon for stopping a page load. Also, it seems that you can’t set Chrome to load blank pages when you open new tabs/windows. All in all, though, the uncluttered look is certainly refreshing. One of the things I like best about Chrome is its speed. It launches, loads pages, and opens new tabs quickly. That last part is particularly speedy, thanks to the small plus sign icon located to the right of the rightmost tab. Clicking this button opens a new tab almost instantly. No shortcuts, no right clicking necessary. Users can also pull tabs out, turning them into new windows, and then drop them back in. And when you open a new page, by default you see screen shots of the sites you visit most, along with links.  See the screenshot below for detail of the address window, icon options, and default opening page.  But in smaller details, Google misses the mark. Why, for instance, is there no mechanism for reopening closed tabs, as there is in both Firefox 3 and Internet Explorer 8? Why are there so few configuration options with no ability to disable or control simple things like the browser cache? And why can’t you browse full screen like you can in all versions of IE and Firefox? Although I’m sure this was an accident, some of Chrome’s privacy/stability measures remind us of IE8. Its Incognito feature, which allows you to surf without adding sites to your history, reminds us of Microsoft’s new InPrivate browsing. Similarly, both browsers claim that even if one tab crashes, the other open tabs will keep working normally. The geek set should try this: press shift + esc and then click Stats for Nerds; you can see a breakdown of how much RAM each tab takes up. Verdict: I like Chrome’s fast speeds, the way it makes it easy to open new tabs, the way you can drag tabs out to create Windows, as well as the potential for desktop integration. In the meantime, Firefox 3 has more features and customization– not to mention a nearly identical interface.

LEAVE A REPLY
Name*
Email* (will not be published)
Website
*Indicates required field
Comments*
Submit Comments

  1. Mike Cane Says:

    Here’s something you’re forgetting. Some of us can’t run Fox 3. I tried and it was slow as frozen molasses on my PC. I had to drop back to Fox 2. So I was very skeptical of Chrome on my old, underpowered RAM-limited hardware. But I’ve been banging on Chrome *hard* and it’s like having a new PC! I can open *double* the number of Tabs than Fox 2 and everything is generally so damned fast that it’s taking my breath away. I also got the first error message:
    http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/googles-chrome-browser-first-error-message/

    If I could get the same plug-ins I need with Fox 2 — like Twitterfox — I’d switch to Chrome permanently.

  2. smallcomputing Says:

    It sounds like the browser has some promise, especially considering this is day one of the beta. While I appreciate the comparisons to FF3 and IE8, I’m wondering why the most obvious comparison was left out: Safari.

    Still, the way it handles tabs sounds interesting and I love the idea that it’ll show you nitty gritty statistics (memory usage). I’ll definitely give it a try and see how it performs, both on my MBP and my netbook(s).

  3. Jackson Says:

    And why exactly would Safari be the obvious comparison? It doesn’t have a fraction of the users IE and FF have and the only ‘mobile’ device with Safari is the iPhone? Which is what this browser will appease best of all – netbook and internet devices.

  4. tomascco Says:

    Safari? Gimme a break? I’m on a Mac and even I don’t use Safari! I just stuck Chrome on my VMWare partition and so far it flies pretty good.

  5. Ben Says:

    “Why, for instance, is there no mechanism for reopening closed tabs, as there is in both Firefox 3 and Internet Explorer 8?”

    Recently closed tabs are listed on the ‘New Tab’ page.

  6. Anonymous Says:

    You can also view the full history of pages by opening a new tab (Ctrl + T) and clicking on “show full history;” granted, the list will only contain the sites that have been stored in the cache since it was last emptied.

  7. Jim Andrew Says:

    How do you edit the title of your most visited thumbnails?
    All my servers have management sites as well as my SANs. They all show up as “HP System Management…” I can’t tell them apart.

    Thanx,
    JimA

FIND A REVIEW
Laptops
All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Brand
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating Editor's Choice 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
Resolution
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options
SUBSCRIBE