Facebook vs. Google+: Which Social Network is Best?

Design

Its trim feature set is a bonus for Google+, with less to clutter the screen. The key is a simple and consistent navigation theme that even carries over to the mobile app (more on that later). Everything branches off a five-button menu bar at the top of each page, linking to the five main sections: Home, Photos, Profile, Circles (friend groups) and Games.

In the Profile section, a similar menu bar below the first provides further breakdown to subsections, including Posts and +1s (essentially “likes”). Similar to Facebook, Google+ has a Home page dominated by a stream of detailed status updates from friends. All the tools for those friends—such as filtering updates by Circle or starting up a chat—live in a narrow left-hand column.

Facebook’s design is pretty busy by comparison. The left column, for example, is packed not only with friend lists and chat tools, but also links to other sections, such as messages, events, groups and apps. (To be fair, Google simply doesn’t have so many features to clutter the space.)

The far right column features the new Ticker, an abbreviated list of friend updates that contain just a few lines each. Clicking on an entry brings up the whole story, including full text, comments and photos. It’s very efficient, but also raises the question: Could this simply replace the big, central column of the page, which has the long-form version of status updates? Having both seems redundant.

The snazziest part of Facebook is a new profile page called Timeline. Clicking a button on the top of the ho-hum Home screen switches over to a seemingly endless page presenting the chronology of the user’s life via status updates, photos, events and affiliations with schools or jobs. It’s a handsome way to look back and reflect—both on one’s life and on how much Facebook knows about it.

Winner: Google+

Like an old house with various additions, Facebook has a lot of interesting places to go, but often has haphazard ways of reaching them. Google’s consistent interface limits confusion.

Facebook vs. Google +

LEAVE A REPLY
Name*
Email* (will not be published)
Website
*Indicates required field
Comments*
Submit Comments

  1. Adam Says:

    “But Facebook allows posting to only one of those groups per update.”

    That’s not true. I post to multiple friend lists all the time. Just select “Custom” and you’ve got much more powerful add/remove list options than Google+.

  2. MarcXW Says:

    Wow was this article biased,… BTW did you take into account the fact that Facebook has official mobile apps available on every platform??? Because Google + doesn’t. Facebook should win just for that.

  3. Sean Captain Says:

    Thanks for commenting.

    Adam, thanks for the tip.

    MarcVW, thanks for the input. Would you explain in more detail how you believe the article is biased?

  4. Ole Says:

    Good article. I find it hard to say that one platform is better than the other because that is not only a question about features and design. The kind of activity that is going on is also an important aspect of the “decision”. A few thoughts:

    - Many people will use both Facebook and G+
    - G+ and Facebook study eachother’s every move and it might very well be that they will end up looking more and more alike. Facebook’s implementation of the subscription feature is one example.
    - I believe that people in a few years time will start asking questions about what they really are getting out of the many hours they spend on social networks. What’s the return on social networking hours so to speak. The winner will be the one that helps people get more value for money. I’m leaning towards G+ on this end.

FIND A REVIEW
Laptops
All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Brand
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
Resolution
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options
SUBSCRIBE