Drawing a Line in the Sandwich: Android Phone Makers Right to Keep Buttons

Geek's Geek Android Buttons

The death of dedicated physical buttons is killing Android phone usability.  First smartphone vendors came for our keyboards, relegating QWERTY handsets to the low-end of the market while so-called “superphones” make you hunt and peck at virtual buttons on their touchscreens. Then dedicated camera buttons started to become an endangered species. Now, with Android 4.0, Google wants to replace the dedicated back / home / menu buttons below the screen with persistent icons that sit below all your apps. Fortunately, vendors are finally drawing a line in the sandwich.

At CES and Mobile World Congress, all the new Ice Cream Sandwich phones we saw had the same row of dedicated navigation buttons below their screens you see on Gingerbread, rather than the virtual set that appears on the Samsung Galaxy Nexus, the only Android 4.0 phone designed by Google. An Android rep told us that the company favors virtual buttons because they change position as you rotate the phone from portrait to landscape mode. Yet, from the HTC One X and One S, each of which has back, home and recent apps buttons at the bottom, to LG’s Optimus L7 phone with its circular physical home button and the unnamed Fujitsu Tegra 3 phone with its hard-plastic buttons, everyone’s ignoring Google’s advice.

Building buttons into the UI is a waste of precious screen real estate.  On the Samsung Galaxy’s Nexus’s 1280 x 720 screen, the virtual button bar takes up a full 96 pixels or 7.5 percent of the available vertical space in portrait mode. That may not seem like much, but it could be the difference between seeing an extra photo on a web page or needing to scroll. When you combine that with a 54-pixel status bar that appears on every screen, you’re losing 11.7 percent of your screen, before you get to application-specific toolbars like the gigantic 98-pixel button row that appears at the bottom of your inbox in Gmail .

Wasted Vertical Real Estate in Ice Cream Sandwich

In landscape mode, the effects of this wasted real-estate are not quite as bad as the button strip cuts 85 pixels off the side of the screen while the status bar still trims 52 off the top. Still every pixel you lose hurts your usability by making you scroll.

ICS in Landscape Mode

“In theory, physical buttons are an attractive concept: they can save precious screen real estate,” Nielsen Norman Group Usability Expert Raluca Budiu told us. “You don’t need to bother with interface widgets for ‘Back’ and ‘Search’ on the screen, if you have dedicated physical buttons that do exactly that.”

Budiu said that, by removing physical buttons from Ice Cream Sandwich, Google is actually getting rid of a major usability faux pas, the ambiguous “menu” button that has so many different functions in earlier versions of Android. The problem, Budiu noted, is that buttons which look the same but have different purposes in different contexts can confuse the user. Fortunately, in Ice Cream Sandwich, the menu buttons are all built into the app itself, not into the three system-wide navigation buttons.

However, buttons like back and home which perform the same function in every app, work better with their own dedicated, physical spaces. By including discrete back, home and recent apps buttons, vendors are providing the same consistent experience you get with the button bar, but are providing a far superior usability experience that saves all-important pixels. If only, the HTCs and LGs of the world would take their new-found button-consciousness a step further and put physical keyboards and dedicated camera buttons on their high-end phones again.

Online Editorial Director Avram Piltch oversees the production and infrastructure of LAPTOP’s web site. With a reputation as the staff’s biggest geek, he has also helped develop a number of LAPTOP’s custom tests, including the LAPTOP Battery Test. Catch the Geek’s Geek column here every week or follow Avram on twitter.

AUTHOR BIO
Avram Piltch
Avram Piltch
The official Geeks Geek, as his weekly column is titled, Avram Piltch has guided the editorial and production of Laptopmag.com since 2007. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram programmed several of LAPTOP's real-world benchmarks, including the LAPTOP Battery Test. He holds a master’s degree in English from NYU.
Avram Piltch on
Facebook Twitter Google+
LEAVE A REPLY
Name*
Email* (will not be published)
Website
*Indicates required field
Comments*
Submit Comments

  1. Jason Says:

    How exactly are you giving up screen real estate by using virtual buttons? The removal of physical buttons allows a longer screen, so the useable screen is the same. What makes virtual buttons great is that apps can hide them. The video player on the galaxy nexus removes the buttons, giving a huge full screen video experience.

  2. Nexus Says:

    Exactly right Jason.

    I have a Nexus and it’s been the best Android phone ever. You do not in the least miss the physical buttons.
    The phone looks ten times better without them. And when viewing video you get a whole huge screen since the screen was expanded into the space taken up by the old physical buttons.

    Nexus got it right.

  3. Kyle Says:

    I used this site to determine the inverse black/white image to reduce AMOLED deterioration effects.

    I received a replacement galaxy nexus, but I don’t use the navigation bar. The blue hue where the navigation bar was from the previous user is easily visible.

    Thinking it was the most I could hope for from a 1.5 Y.O. phone with a AMOLED screen, I decided to create an inverse .jpg (nav. and status bar = white, middle of screen = black) using the pixel heights I found on this page.

    I have left my screen on maximum brightness with the inverse image and will continue to for the rest of this week.

    Hopefully I can overcome a years worth of AMOLED degradation in a week. *Fingers Cossed*

    Needless to say, I will never buy an OLED screen again.

    Excellent article, by the way. I entirely agree with the author.

FIND A REVIEW
Laptops
All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Brand
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
Resolution
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options
SUBSCRIBE