Can Intel Catch ARM?

Tablet Counterattack

Intel is keenly aware of the threat ARM poses, as well as the opportunity to break into a market that’s exploding. Sales of tablets alone are expected to triple this year, reaching 55 million. That’s why Intel formed a netbook and tablet group (emphasis on tablet) in December 2010.

While sales of shrunken laptops continue to grow in emerging markets, U.S. shoppers are increasingly choosing slates over netbooks. “My tablet basically goes everywhere with me,” said Ian Drew, executive vice president of marketing at ARM. “It’s got 10-hour battery life and it’s easy to carry around. I find myself using my laptop more and more just at home.”

Although the tablet market is still in its infancy, there’s no question that ARM and its partners have nearly all the momentum. In fact, Compal, the world’s second-largest notebook manufacturer, said it expects 90 percent of the 3.8 million tablet devices it ships this year to use chips from ARM and run Google’s Android operating system.

Why is ARM so dominant? Because most tablets today are based on smart phone architecture, with an emphasis on ultra-low power. “Intel hasn’t really been under the gun as much because they haven’t had the pressure to be as power-efficient over the last few years,” said Flint Pulskamp, research director of wireless semiconductors at IDC. “A laptop has a much bigger form factor. It has a bigger battery. Intel has had other priorities.”

Intel’s priorities are now shifting, and the company claims that more than 35 tablets will ship this year with its Atom processor inside. Many of these slates, which use Intel’s Oak Trail CPU, promise up to 8 hours of battery life. And it’s not just Windows 7 tablets, either. Intel says Android-powered Atom devices are coming from ASUS, Lenovo, and others.

However, with both Nvidia and Qualcomm bringing more powerful dual-core ARM processors to hot tablets such as the Motorola Xoom and the upcoming HP TouchPad, Intel faces an uphill battle. “I can’t imagine why, given the choice, anybody would pick Atom,” said Bill Dally, Nvidia’s chief scientist. “I think it’s just a lack of competitiveness in terms of the energy efficiency of the processor.”

Bill Kircos, general manager of sales and marketing for Intel’s new Netbook and Tablet Group, believes that the power gap between Atom and ARM is overblown. “I do believe the whole battery life perception is much more perception than reality,” he argued. “If you do an apples to apples thing, we’re giving you better performance for a specific length of time.”

Kircos admits that Intel still has a ways to go on efficiency, but he also stressed that the company will be throwing its vast resources behind Atom to go through three nanometer process generations in three years. Talk about defying Moore’s Law. “We have a line of sight there, so I don’t think the battery life thing will be a challenge.”

IDC’s Pulskamp agrees that Intel will catch up to ARM. But it will take some time. “In the next two or three years, the power-performance difference will probably be fairly negligible.” He says that the operating system and software will become paramount.

Intel vs ARM

Mark Spoonauer
Mark Spoonauer
Responsible for the editorial vision for Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide, Mark Spoonauer has been Editor in Chief of LAPTOP since 2003 and has covered technology for nearly 15 years. Mark speaks at key tech industry events and makes regular media appearances on CNBC, Fox and CNN. Mark was previously reviews editor at Mobile Computing, and his work has appeared in Wired, Popular Science and Inc.
Mark Spoonauer on
Twitter Google+
Email* (will not be published)
*Indicates required field
Submit Comments

  1. Techy Says:

    I hope in the mist of all these improvements in chips that they also make improvements in the OS, or more over I a better keyboard to type on

All Product Types Accessories Cars Digital Camcorders Digital Cameras eReaders GPS Laptops MP3 & Video Players Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets / MIDs VoIP Wi-Fi
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS Averatec BenQ CTL Corp. Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Sager Samsung Sony Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 4 5 6 7 8 9
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1920x1080 1920x1200 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options