<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Talks Subsidized Netbooks, More-Flexible 3G Pricing, and More-Connected Gadgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/att-talks-subsidized-netbooks-more-flexible-3g-pricing-and-more-connected-gadgets/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/att-talks-subsidized-netbooks-more-flexible-3g-pricing-and-more-connected-gadgets</link>
	<description>News and views on today&#039;s hottest laptops, cell phones, and other mobile devices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:43:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Johnston</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/att-talks-subsidized-netbooks-more-flexible-3g-pricing-and-more-connected-gadgets/comment-page-1#comment-17628</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=11830#comment-17628</guid>
		<description>Who ever said that netbooks need to be small or cheap? It&#039;s a portmanteau of Internet + Notebook. The thing could be a quad core with 8Gb and covered with diamonds for all it matters to the name.

Subnotebooks/ultraportables are small, yes and ULPCs are cheap, but nobody ever said you need to have all of three things in the same box. It just happens that that&#039;s the way the market likes it :)

I&#039;d personally pay full price for a netbook if it meant the thing was more durable, had longer battery life, a high resolution screen, etc. even if it had no local storage and just a &quot;good enough&quot; processor (that is, &quot;good enough&quot; that I never catch it pegged).

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who ever said that netbooks need to be small or cheap? It&#8217;s a portmanteau of Internet + Notebook. The thing could be a quad core with 8Gb and covered with diamonds for all it matters to the name.</p>
<p>Subnotebooks/ultraportables are small, yes and ULPCs are cheap, but nobody ever said you need to have all of three things in the same box. It just happens that that&#8217;s the way the market likes it <img src='http://blog.laptopmag.com/wpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;d personally pay full price for a netbook if it meant the thing was more durable, had longer battery life, a high resolution screen, etc. even if it had no local storage and just a &#8220;good enough&#8221; processor (that is, &#8220;good enough&#8221; that I never catch it pegged).</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.laptopmag.com/att-talks-subsidized-netbooks-more-flexible-3g-pricing-and-more-connected-gadgets/comment-page-1#comment-17536</link>
		<dc:creator>anon anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.laptopmag.com/?p=11830#comment-17536</guid>
		<description>Interesting and information article. However, AT&amp;T doesn&#039;t seem to be aware that the Ausus eeepc 901 already gets 5 to 7 hours on the stock battery. Hopefully AT&amp;T will eventually have enough 3G capacity to offer unlimited plans and understand that WiFi isn&#039;t the answer to unlimited use, simply because the user doesn&#039;t need AT&amp;T for unlimited WiFi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and information article. However, AT&amp;T doesn&#8217;t seem to be aware that the Ausus eeepc 901 already gets 5 to 7 hours on the stock battery. Hopefully AT&amp;T will eventually have enough 3G capacity to offer unlimited plans and understand that WiFi isn&#8217;t the answer to unlimited use, simply because the user doesn&#8217;t need AT&amp;T for unlimited WiFi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

